Lorelei’s Bondage Blog

Saturday, July 15, 2006
Current mood: miserable

I don’t want to be the crazy bitch who forces medicine into my dog for the final months of her life. I want to be the lady who sits with her and pets her and comforts her.

Instead, at the moment, Alex views me as that asshole who keeps putting weird crap in her mouth and in her food.

Every 4-6 hours there’s something or other on the schedule that forces me to act like an idiot in her eyes… some days she won’t eat so I have to crush the pills, mix them with honey and smush the honey on her gums and tongue so she can’t spit out or avoid her medicine. We also have little tubes of liquid painkiller to squirt it on her tongue. She’s quite annoyed with us. We’re not even overdoing it; the vet discontinued most of her meds and pared us down to only the most essential, so as not to harass her any more than necessary.

She’s not “near the end” — the reason she avoids food is she now has an ulcer from all those years that she was on meds back when she had leukemia.

Lately she’s vomiting blood so all we can do is keep getting painkillers and antibiotics into her. Then last night she really wanted to eat, but the vet said I couldn’t feed her yet. :( Alex got really frustrated with me and threw a tantrum of sorts. She must think I’m a complete dimwit to “forget” to feed her 2 meals in a row.

4 am we get up and give her two medicines to coat her stomach, so that we can try feeding her at 6 am. 5 am I’m still awake and so is she, so I figure, Hey here’s a moment where I can sit and pet her and be her friend instead of doing something she hates. I go over to her to be with her, and she sees me coming and gets up and wobbles away to go hide from me.

So now she doesn’t want me to come near her because she feels like I’m just bad news.

It sucks being this kind of “mom”. On the other hand, if I stop giving her the painkiller she’ll have terrible stomach aches. If I stop giving her the stomach coating, or ignore the vet instructions in how/when/what to feed her, she’ll go into another horrific phase of vomiting blood. If I stop giving her the antibiotics she’ll die of a massive infection of the bladder & urethra. So I have to keep being the “crazy bitch” in her life.

But this isn’t the relationship I want to have with her for her final months. She doesn’t want to be with me. I miss having her regard me as a friend. I want to cuddle her. :(

Saturday, July 15, 2006
Current mood: scared

[this post includes replies that were received via MySpace]

Some months ago the Department of Justice announced there would be a new push to arrest and prosecute pornographic obscenity. They announced a “short list” of items they regarded as obscene. One of the images listed is that of one adult peeing on another adult.

Peeing isn’t my fetish so I don’t think about it very often. But one adult peeing on another, in a video, which is viewed pretty much only by other adults who like peeing — I seriously doubt such a thing changes our world very much. Or seriously affects our society in a negative way. Or is dangerous. So dangerous that federal agents must spend years of their lives investigating and prosecuting it when they could be working on other cases. (An aside: I still vividly remember when my niece was kidnapped, the federal agent told us his own workload was 90 active cases of various kinds, and that really nothing would be done about my niece.)

Variations of the feds’ obscenity list decorate the websites of the billing services that are trying to work with adult companies. Take a look at poor CCBill’s exhaustive list of things they can’t bill for:

…cannot have on webpages/site and cannot link to such webpages/sites. Any and all depictions and/or actual occurrences and/or content and/or marketing and/or references to: 1. Underage: Provocative and/or Non-Provocative; including Hentai or animations. - 2. Rape: Rape, involuntary sex or forced sex; in all mediums including Hentai or animations. - 3. Bodily Excretions: Scat/fecal matter, person to person watersports, and/or a woman’s period or menstruation. - 4. Extreme Violence: Acts of extreme violence, and/or depictions of extreme violence in all mediums including Hentai or animations. Extreme pain and/or implying and/or suggesting extreme pain. Flogging (severe beating). - 5. Bloodletting or Bloodshed. Consumption of Blood. (Webmasters note! The blood rule can affect your linking to vampire fetish, goth fetish, and horror movie fetish sites!) Self-mutilation. Cannibalism. Depiction of gore inflicted by oneself and/or another individual or group. ‘Snuff’ or ‘Fantasy Snuff’ content and/or content involving or implying death or serious bodily injury. Autopsy photos. (Webmasters note: This can affect your linking to necro fetish and “darksites”.) - 6. Diaper Fetish: Diapers, Diaper Fetish and/or sites which depict models in diapers in all mediums including Hentai or animations; Sexual or Non-Sexual. — Not forbidden on CCBill’s website and not in the email list, but forbidden according to CCBill staff: Chloroform (chloro, chloroformed), Kidnap (kidnapped, kidnapping), Ransom.

That little word “chloroform” is what just lost me my merchant account. Not via CCBill but as I said, variations of these Forbidden Lists are everywhere now. As it turns out, two years ago when the merchant bank accepted my company for an account, my site was linked to an offsite webpage that had the word “chloro” appearing twice. Apparently it is that very link that led to them terminating my account a week ago. Even though they originally approved my account.

Now for the fun part. Apparently, these days, if your company is terminated for a “Content” reason, the bank automatically puts you on “TFL”. The Fraud List. Even though I didn’t commit fraud, I’m now on some sort of blacklist so other banks won’t want to give me a merchant account.

To give you an idea of how this affects things, 10 years down the road I could be trying to get a merchant account to run a candy booth in a mall, and be turned down because on my record, it looks like I did something fraudulent.

For the past couple years, merchant banks and billing services have been sporting these lists and dropping companies and giving people a hard time. One by one we’ve seen producers and even huge companies leveled to the ground. (People like to think that iBill caused it’s own problems, but it all started when their merchant bank said “we’re ditching you”. And two other prominent Adult-Site billers had died before that when their merchant banks abandoned them.) For some reason a lot of people see all this activity as random. As if there’s one narrow-minded shlub or board of directors at each place that initiates drop-kicking the adult producers. At this point I can’t believe that any more.

A few months ago CCBill suddenly began harassing a large number of their clients to “clean up” their sites. Ashley Renee was one of those contacted; they made her delete huge numbers of photos, even a few in which she was simply being led by tied hands and “looked unhappy”. During a phone call, someone let slip that CCBill had been “told” to do this cleanup.

I think that if a merchant bank really was the one initiating the cleanup, they would give a reasonable deadline and work with the biller to reach the goal. They wouldn’t want to lose all the money they make… they would want things to work out… they’d have no reason to put sudden, hysterical pressure.

So, I admit it, I think these demands come from somewhere higher up. Someone or something higher up makes contacts and says “do or die”. And that’s why there’s such an irrational, rushed hysteria to these ultimatums.

And such ridiculousness to some items on these lists.

My parents had, individually, unfortunate experiences with religious intolerance. For example, my father was going to be a minister. He went to college and studied Philosophy and logic figuring it would make him good at talking nonbelievers into believing. Instead, he lost his faith in the process. This was a difficult thing for him and his parents.

He was an excellent student, and he was awarded a special scholarship that would send him to Europe for a year to study in a unique program. However, when he was getting ready to leave, he was called in to the Dean’s office. The Dean said “I’ve heard you’re not a Christian any more.” My dad was like “I guess not”. The Dean told him that the university was certainly not going to send him to Europe to represent the U.S. And they yanked his scholarship.

Their fear was that a person who doesn’t believe in God, has no fear of God, cannot be moral and can’t/won’t be a good person… in other words what if he went over there to Europe and raped and murdered people because he wasn’t religious… etc…

There are a lot of people who believe that only the fear of God keeps people in line. And maybe that’s why they’re so anxious to enforce religious beliefs, even onto non believers,, even onto people of faiths that aren’t exactly the same as their own; I think it’s because they’re afraid the whole world will just be full of atheist murderers or rampaging “heathens”… But I think people can be good people even if they’re not particularly religious. And I don’t think that a single faith system needs to be imposed on 100 percent of people in the world just to make society work.

I believe that I could just possibly go through life making pictures of myself tied up, and letting other adults see those pictures, and link to a webpage with the word “chloro” on it, without destroying the fabric of society, or adversely affecting civilization — in fact I believe that my website has done more good than harm to this world.

If I don’t get another merchant account, I will lose my current list of members, which will be an immediate drop of about 40 percent of my company’s income. My little company supports a family of 4. I’m wide awake in the middle of the night because I’m very worried and scared. When I was growing up I never would have imagined that the intolerance of strangers could affect my life in a drastic way, like how it affected my parents.

5:16 AM - 10 Comments - 6 Kudos

================

Lorelei

Oh — and Jon’s bondage blog was deleted (without warning) by bravenet this week. Sigh.

Posted by Lorelei on Saturday, July 15, 2006 at 6:04 AM

================

Whiplash Studio.com

First, with out question, I think you’re website has done more good than anything else. I know it was one of the first sites I visited years ago that helped me feel much better about who I am. I’d go as far to say I think you and the great Shevette (for those in the know) really helped me feel more comfortable in my own skin about this part of my life.

It’s really disheartening to hear these problems befalling you. I’m about 6 months away from hopefully starting my site (hired my first model this week!) and the billing part of it is the one thing I am most perplexed about. Without question, this is making me think twice about content and whether or not I’ve even link to other pages now. I hope something works out for you and please keeps us up to date on the solution you do find.

In addition, I don’t know what recourse you’re going to take when it comes to being put on this fraud list, but I don’t think the bank can legally do this. Fraud is a crime and they must have a basis to make this accusation against you. While they do hold the right to refuse business to anyone they see fit, they do not hold the right to screw with your credit. You might want to look a little more into that one as far as protecting yourself.

I for one think its crap that someone else, be it a religious organization or the government (which is what I think it is) can come thru and take out our expression of free speech. They aren’t shutting down adult book stores are they? Is the porn industry being closed? No. You know why? It’s easier for mom and dad to make sure Timmy doesn’t go into such an establishment than it is to make sure they don’t sure by a website. I think a lot of parents see the computer the same way so many saw TV; a means to occupy their child, a baby sitter more so than anything else. So rather teach their children right and wrong, rather than monitor where they go and what they do, they leave it up to someone else to remove content they don’t agree with from the medium. It’s always pushed on to someone else. Thats just my two cents on bad parenting.

In closing L, I think the religious intolerance you’ve dealt with just plain sucks for lack of a better word. As with any religion or race, it’s the few bad eggs that make the rest of us look bad. I for one like to think of my self as a very religious person. I’ve visited your site many a time and what I’ve seen there hasn’t affected my morality one iota. If I came to something on your page that wasn’t my cup a tea, I simply went to another part of your page and was just fine with that, no big uproar, no proclamation of “I’ve never come here again!” And again, consider my self a pretty good Christian. As a Christian, I want you to know that I’m praying for you and your site and your family. I’m praying that you find a way around your problems and your webpage returns to the success it has always been a prospers for many years to come. And I do so because I want you to know, we’re not all out to get you (little lol there). We’re not all rotten eggs. Best wishes to you and may this all resolve in your favor very soon.

Posted by Whiplash Studio.com on Saturday, July 15, 2006 at 6:55 AM

================

Duct Tape Messiah

As leads the government-so goes the companies; or is it the other way ’round?

Anyone feel safer yet? We’re all watching each other and reporting on each other and sending out memos, faxes and writing new laws to protect ourselves- but does anyone really feel safer yet? I just feel violated. I feel like a child and not in a good way with that spirit of joyous abandon and freedom. I feel like that kid from the wrong part of town; the one everyone whispers about, points at and make rude comments behind his back. Didn’t do nothing. Didn’t hurt anyone. But you wouldn’t know it from all the watching and whispering.

Posted by Duct Tape Messiah on Saturday, July 15, 2006 at 4:27 PM

================

Charlzm

How’s the option of moving billing to an offshore company going? I know the US government is trying to go after offshore gambling sites now (probably due to not being part of their revenue stream more than anything else), but hopefully they’re not going to go after international credit card billing companies yet.

Posted by Charlzm on Saturday, July 15, 2006 at 7:33 PM

================

Lorelei

I’m told that the Fraud List I’m on is an international list, but I’m applying to two different offshore merchant banks to see if they’ll take me anyway.

Posted by Lorelei on Saturday, July 15, 2006 at 7:49 PM

================

Richard

It’s sad how the phrase “religious intolerance” has come into acceptance. The thing that is especially disconcerting is that most religions teach tolerance. One of the things I’ve learned, since getting involved in bondage forums, is that an interest in bondage crosses religion and politics. A person, with conservative politics and a religious background, can also find a fascination with bondage. Their background may force them to repress and avoid the subject, but it doesn’t mean that they aren’t turned on by bondage.

Human beings are imperfect creatures and it is not uncommon for imperfect creatures to do the wrong thing. I’ve seen many different examples of how people use religion in their lives. I’ve seen many use religion to better themselves and they quietly go through their lives practicing the doctrine of their faiths in good and generous ways. I’ve seen others dangerously treating their religion like a legal treatise where sentences, taken out of context, allow them to do very irreligious things while wrapping themselves within the pretext of the sanctity of their religion. It is a very rare thing to see politics mixed with religion in a fashion that isn’t troublesome. There is something about group dynamics that favor the loudest person over the smartest and devolves that group’s dynamics to the loud individuals who commit them to action no matter how wrong those actions may seem later. I don’t blame the sins of religion on the faiths being practiced, but on the people exercising their religions the wrong way.

The two things that surprise me most about the current spate of censorship is the near lack of public discussion and near silence from organizations like the ACLU that one would expect to be on the forefront of the issue. The end effect is that the public is largely unaware that their choices are being slowly taken away from them.

I hope you can get past this.

Posted by Richard on Sunday, July 16, 2006 at 3:18 PM

================

Jeff Tucker!

The country we live in gets scarier everyday….BIG BROTHER is watching and all that.

Posted by Jeff Tucker! on Monday, July 17, 2006 at 6:09 PM

================

The Dance Commander

Isn’t it always funny how the goverment says “Freedom of Expression”? But then when it goes out of the boundries of the way THEY want it expressed it gets yanked and becomes “Taboo” or “Immoral” What next? Bondage Photography linked to Terrorists? It’s stupid and moronic and when I rule the world I will make three rules.

1. Freedom of Expresion will be literal.

2. Ben and Jerry’s Ice cream will be sold at absolutely no charge.

and 3. The Show Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel will be picked up and run another twenty seasons. Because Buffy and Angel totally own. (lmao)

Anyways, I hate how hypocritical people are. You’d think they would spend all the money used to shut down something as harmless as your site and actually put it towards something harmful….like oh say…I dunno….maybe finding a dirty looking dude who likes sending the government video diaries of his next plans…..

Anyways Keep you head up Lorelei, and I swear if I have to I’ll start my own petition to stop this shit….in fact that’s not a bad idea.

Posted by The Dance Commander on Friday, July 21, 2006 at 10:37 PM

================

bill

very well stated.each day we lose more and more of our freedom of choice and self-expression.critizism runs rampant in the “holy”, these ar the people who are ruining the fabric of society by trying to forcefully impose their outdated ideas from an era long since passed.who the hell do these people think that they are, trying to decide what’s good and bad for us, and then attempting to cram it down out throat.i am a full grown man, and have been for a while.i have been making decisions on my own for years (good or bad it doesn’t matter)i am the one that suffers from a bad mistake or benefit from a good one. i think certian “people” need to get a hobbie and concentrate on whats really ruining our society. politics,religion and greed. you would think these people would be more concern with national security than cleaning up a love bondage site that is owned and operated by two full grown,concenting adults.to those “people” whom seek to impose their will and try to tell me what i can and can’t view i say ” now go away or i shall fart in your general direction!” and ” your mother is a hamster and your father smells of elderberries!”

Posted by bill on Saturday, August 19, 2006 at 12:37 AM

Monday, July 10, 2006
Current mood: annoyed

[this post includes replies that were received on MySpace]

While I was out of town, the bank terminated my Bedroom Bondage website’s merchant account on Friday — without warning.

For those who aren’t familiar with what that means, a merchant account is what a seller uses to accept Visa/Mastercard from customers.

I phoned them today and they said the content on my website was unacceptable. I pointed out that my content had not changed, and that it was the same as it was last year when they accepted my account. She didn’t reply to that. I asked her if their guidelines had changed. She didn’t reply to that. I pointed out that my customers paid (through them) to receive a certain product and as a seller didn’t I have a responsibility to those customers to provide to them the product they paid for? She didn’t reply to that. I mentioned this was rather sudden and couldn’t I have the standard 30-day notice before termination? She said no, this was immediate termination.

Another fun fact is that when a merchant account is closed, any money the bank has that belongs to the seller, is then held for 9 months “just in case” it’s needed for any refunds. So the income they recently collected for my site will now be in their hands for 9 months.

They told me I could clean up the site and then apply for reinstatement. I’ve decided not to do that. If they approved my content last year and now they’re telling me to delete some of it, who knows what more they’d make me delete a few months from now. Perhaps if I were just a generic business owner of some kind, I would do whatever my merchant bank wanted, but my websites have always reflected what I personally am into — they’re a slice of me — and I’m not up for symbolically cutting myself up and casting off some fingers and toes of who I am.

Like many other beleagured bondage sites these days, at the moment I’m looking into billing services offered in Europe. I do have an account with Verotel but I’m not sure I want to put all my eggs in one basket. We’ll see.

Now signing off,

The disgusting lady who’s into bondage and all that stuff (lol)

–Lorelei

9:18 AM - 17 Comments - 15 Kudos

====================

marDizzy

Not easy being you.
-m

Posted by marDizzy on Monday, July 10, 2006 at 9:26 AM

===============

Dark Minded Promotions™

That is so messed up. How dare they do that. In fact, i don’t think it is legal. What are you planning to do for your paid accounts now?

Posted by Dark Minded Promotions™ on Monday, July 10, 2006 at 9:34 AM

================

Lorelei

This is very legal. For the past few years, many merchant banks have been doing this.

Legally they have the right to say what other companies they want to do business with and what sort of content they will accept.

Over the weekend some of my members’ accounts “got lost” because of this so I put them on a temporary manual membership. I don’t want people losing their favorite username just because my renewal system is messed up by this development at the moment.

Not sure what I’m gonna do yet. Will keep everyone informed.

Posted by Lorelei on Monday, July 10, 2006 at 9:43 AM

================

Pete Puma

In my book, there is nothing worse than puritanical hypocrites! It’s obvious your bank is filled with these vermin. I’ve no doubt that if the banks books were to opened to the light of day, there would be represented those far worse than some tasteful (and quite alluring) bondage imagery. I’d wager that they are still customers and no doubt getting their asses kissed.
Why? They are big business. Trust me, the only “acceptable content” a bank is concerned with is the content of the green and folding stuff in their vaults.

Hank in there Lorelei!

Posted by Pete Puma on Monday, July 10, 2006 at 9:50 AM

================

Charlzm

I understand that they can do what they like as a business, but I am disappointed nonetheless. I also understand the anger others feel about, but really, what can be done?

Move to another bank. No amount of cajoling will get them to reverse their decision, so best to move on.

Sad, though.

Posted by Charlzm on Monday, July 10, 2006 at 10:56 AM

================

Chuck

This Stinks! Another fine example of Big Brother regulating personal stuff. You’d think you were some kind of anarchist. Which, by the way, I learned something two months ago from a member of another support group of mine. It seems that for every one agent investigating terrorism, 100 are investigating the sex industry, which I guess includes all of us. OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK! Chuck.

Posted by Chuck on Monday, July 10, 2006 at 12:27 PM

================

Duct Tape Messiah

My sympathies,

Welcome to the new kinder, gentler, safer America of George W. Bush. Where we are free to express ourselves as the companies tell us to and exposing government spying on it’s own citizens is bad for us.

Posted by Duct Tape Messiah on Monday, July 10, 2006 at 1:00 PM

================

John

.. width=”425″ height=”350″> src=”http://www.youtube.com/v/YyBjmeGD7ZE” type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” width=”425″ height=”350″>..>

Posted by John on Thursday, July 13, 2006 at 12:00 AM

================

Lorelei

Thanks for your thoughts :) Paypal does not permit any adult-oriented products — they drop-kicked me a coupla years ago.

In the current climate it’s become close to impossible for a bondage company to get any billing service within the U.S. We’re all being quietly shoved overseas. LOL :)

Posted by Lorelei on Wednesday, July 12, 2006 at 11:48 PM

================

Donald

well that sucks. Effing bankers

Posted by Donald on Friday, July 14, 2006 at 1:56 PM

================

WestBound

Holding on to the money “just in case” they have to pay someone back?. 9 months interest will net them a nice little profit from that lot. Money grabbing bastards!!!!

Chin up girl, we all appreciate how much you do for us bondage devotees and love you for it

Posted by WestBound on Friday, July 14, 2006 at 5:14 PM

Wednesday, June 28, 2006
Current mood: silly

[this post includes replies that were made via MySpace]

I would just like to tell my breasts how much I appreciate them. :)

When I first got breasts, I was so happy with them. I felt myself up every night. How wonderful and warm and squeezable!

When I first moved to California and didn’t have a boyfriend, I remember lying in bed with two handfuls thinking “This is a waste — two nice breasts and no one here to enjoy them!”

I was just in the shower and realized, hey, I still love these breasts! They’re a blast to soap up. They’re size D now so I can’t grab all of ‘em, but I do my best. Thank goodness Jon has bigger hands than I do.

Ok that’s my soliloquy about my breasts. LOL!

10:52 AM - 16 Comments - 13 Kudos

===============

Charlzm

Lorelei,

I don’t know if you’ve covered this anywhere, I hope I’m not making a fool of myself by being wrong in my observations and if it’s too personal, then by all means don’t answer, but…

why did you decide to go for the augmentation? I for one can say I thought your breasts were just fine all along.

Posted by Charlzm on Wednesday, June 28, 2006 at 11:10 AM

================

Lorelei

Oh good lord! ROFL!

When I was in high school my breasts were B cups.

By my 30s they were C cups.

I’m in my 40s, have gained a little more weight, and now they’re D cups.

No doctoring was necessary.

Posted by Lorelei on Wednesday, June 28, 2006 at 11:15 AM

================

Charlzm

Color me embarrassed, then. I saw the increase from the Kristine Imboch days through to current photos and just assumed the increase must have been… unnatural.

Pardon me if I offended.

There are just so many augmentations out there that, without evidence to the contrary, I just assume most any woman in the adult industry with larger than B cups has probably gone under the knife.

Oops.

Posted by Charlzm on Wednesday, June 28, 2006 at 12:05 PM

================

Pete Puma

And a lovely soliloquy it is! Your breasts are indeed a wonderful sight to behold. Jon is one lucky fellow! No doubt about that!

Posted by Pete Puma on Wednesday, June 28, 2006 at 11:12 AM

================

BBQ

Hi Lorelei,

I just want to say that I love your breasts too. Infact, I love all of you.

Posted by BBQ on Wednesday, June 28, 2006 at 12:48 PM

================

Tess

In honor of your breasts I have made a donation here http://www.komen.org/ It is the home page of the Susan G. Koman Breast Cancer Foundation. Like you, I love mine, and I intend to help to make sure we all have ours for all our lives…

Tess

Posted by Tess on Wednesday, June 28, 2006 at 4:17 PM

================

Richard

As you’re no doubt noticing, everybody else seems to appreciate your breasts too. I’ve been a longtime fan.

One of the unfair aspects of life is that you can do an ode to your breasts and it comes across as cute and funny.

If a guy were to write a soliloquy about his penis, it would be seen as crass and egotistical. For all I know, I could have been named for mine if my parents had seen some potential in the infant they saw. I don’t really know why “Dick” became a nickname for “Richard”. The letter “R” sounds a lot different than the letter “D”. The most famous Richard is the medieval king, Richard the Lionhearted. Maybe he didn’t earn the title “lionhearted” solely for the lion’s heart. I can’t really say that I play with it. Most of the time, it’s just in the way and playing the morning ritual of “avoid the zipper”. Although it does allow me to write my name in the snow, that’s a feat which has very little demand in the real world.

Unfortunately, the penis has a bad reputation and is viewed by society as an awful thing. It’s covered up as much as possible whereas breasts are prominently and publicly on display. Entire industries exist to enhance and show off breasts. Women can enjoy looking at breasts as much as guys do, but the same cannot be said about the lowly male member.

There’s no question that breasts are enjoyed by many. In this politically correct society, men are not supposed to notice them. A woman can wear a padded bra that thrusts them forward and pushes them together. She can wear a low cut top that draws attention to them. Yet, men are not supposed to look. How can we not? I try not to stare at a woman’s breasts. I know it’s impolite. I know that they are not the measure of a woman’s character. Yet, there they are. I try to look away, yet they keep drawing my gaze back. I try to get my eyes out of there, but they keep pulling me back.

Anyway, I’m happy to hear that you’re in a silly mood. If you ever hear of a good bargain on a used time machine, let me know. I’d like to go back in time to that period when you were alone in Cali.

Now, excuse me while I try to see if there’s a Breastaholics Anonymous in my town.

Posted by Richard on Wednesday, June 28, 2006 at 5:46 PM

================

Richard

Oh well, it doesn’t appear that I’ll be penning that masterpiece. Unlike breasts, which are primarily composed of fatty tissue, the lowly penis isn’t and gains no benefit from increased weight. In fact, the poor little bugger only shrinks a bit with age. When a woman puts on weight, some of it goes into the fatty tissue of the breasts, making them larger. If Lorelei could somehow bottle whatever it is about her physiognomy that channeled half her weight gain into her breasts, she’d never have to worry about money again. Of course, if that could happen, plastic surgeons would be taking a hit contract out on her. The last thing they want to see is a natural means to move fat from a woman’s body to her breasts resulting in larger breasts and less body fat, killing two of their profitable surgical procedures.

Even if my penis were fortunate enough to grow more impressive with age, I doubt that I’d want to talk about it. I’d rather talk about breasts any day of the week. After all, I don’t have them. It’s just as well I don’t have breasts. If I did, I’d never leave the house.

At least there’s one woman who won’t beat me up for staring inappropriately. Is copious drooling okay?

signed
A notorious fan

Posted by Richard on Friday, June 30, 2006 at 4:29 PM

================

Duct Tape Messiah

Never met a pair I didn’t like. No such thing as too big or too small regardless or what people think. What is the size of a perfect breast, you may well ask? so long as it reach from the woman’s chest to my lips or the ends of my fingers, it’s picture perfect.

Posted by Duct Tape Messiah on Wednesday, June 28, 2006 at 7:58 PM

================

Richard

Oh drat…now I’m getting breast envy.

Posted by Richard on Thursday, June 29, 2006 at 3:35 PM

================

Feeling No Pain

your breasts and nipples are very nice
thank you

Posted by Feeling No Pain on Saturday, July 08, 2006 at 5:54 AM

================

Richard

A&E has a two-hour documentary tonight (and repeated much later in the wee hours) on Cleavage.

I’ll be thinking about you.

Posted by Richard on Friday, July 21, 2006 at 5:26 PM

Thursday, June 08, 2006
Current mood: annoyed

[this post includes replies that were added on MySpace]

Someone called me “sweetheart” today and it reminded me once again of a pet peeve.

Over the years I’ve occasionally run into men who will call me honey, darling, sweetheart, babe, stuff like that… all sorts of nicknames that I expect from a boyfriend or husband, but not from a male acquaintance or a stranger.

One guy did it for a long time — someone who was renting the studio every month — and I tolerated it because I needed the money and didn’t want to make waves, even though being talked to like a bedmate made me squirmingly uncomfortable. Finally he called me an endearment in front of my boyfriend, and it was time to say something.

Whenever I say that men shouldn’t do this, they always think I’m overreacting. They say it doesn’t mean anything and it’s not meant to be sexist or territorial or demeaning etc.

But here’s what I think of it. I have never, ever seen any of these guys call some other guy they just met “sweetheart”. That means the namecalling is gender based — it’s sexist. If they’re not my boyfriend or my husband, I don’t think it’s appropriate for them to be addressing me with a sexual/gender pet name. I’m not their pet.

How would one of these guys feel if some man had just met them and started calling them Sweetie? Wouldn’t they feel a little uncomfortable? Yes? Then how come I’m supposed to feel perfectly comfortable with it? I’m no more interested in being their Sweetie, than they want to be the Sweetie of some guy they’ve just met…

I’d like to hear from other women about this.

2:02 PM - 10 Comments - 5 Kudos

=============

cyber_tease

I’ve known men who would react aggressively, perhaps violently, to being called “sweetie” or “darling” by another man. Because they would interpret it as a form of unwelcome sexual overture, and an inference of their sexuality. Yeah, you could say they find it uncomfortable and offensive, emasculating even.

In my opinion, the men who indulge in calling a woman acquaintence by sexual/gender pet names do so from the assumption that women like to be addressed this way because they need to feel “petted” and/or need male approval. Also, in addressing them with a generic/pet name rather than their given name they are removing the woman’s identity and individuality. It’s an attempt to disarm and establish authority over the woman.

My personal view is that it’s discourteous and disrespective to assume such familiarity with anyone with whom you don’t have a close affectionate bond regardless of gender.

Posted by cyber_tease on Thursday, June 08, 2006 at 4:26 PM

================

Lorelei

That’s interesting what you added about removing a woman’s identity with the namecalling. It suddenly dawned on me that in some cases, there may be men who can’t remember my odd name, or can’t remember how to pronounce it. LOL!

Posted by Lorelei on Thursday, June 08, 2006 at 6:15 PM

================

Jungle Man

Note to self: If I ever meet Darla at a con, don’t call her sweetie…

I am one of those people that use these terms, it’s something that I think I picked up from my Grandfather who always used it around strangers, and this is honestly the first time I have EVER heard anyone complain about it. I can easily see that there are people who would misuse it in a condescending, greasy vile way as a means of objectifying you, but I think you both are reading waaay too much into it when it comes to how it is used by most people. Would you be as upset about it if it came from a woman? Because odds are it would have the exact same intent behind it: a simple term of friendship.

I am not trying to say that you are wrong in thinking like this, we all have our little quirks and things that get to us, just try and think about the fact that most of the people who use these terms are not trying to attach a negative vibe to it. They simply want to make a positive verbal connection somehow and they try to do so in this way.

Posted by Jungle Man on Friday, June 09, 2006 at 1:12 PM

================

Lorelei

Hmm… You ask if I would be upset if a woman who didn’t know me well, started calling me pet names. You’re changing the question. If someone who is a head taller than you — maybe even two heads taller than you — and about 80-100 pounds heavier than you, calls you a pet name without having asked if it’s okay… do you feel absolutely comfortable asking them why they’ve decided to do that instead of using your name? Because that’s the situation that men put women into. Men should be aware that they can automatically intimidate women who don’t know them very well — simply because they’re larger, heavier, and have an unknown disposition at that point.

If a woman calls me a weird name, I’m not so nervous about saying something. :)

Posted by Lorelei on Friday, June 09, 2006 at 5:05 PM

================

Richard

Hopefully, you won’t mind a guy commenting on this blog.

I’ve always considered those types of nicknames as often being mildly condescending in tone. It’s why I don’t use them. Haven’t you seen a lot of male domination videos where the guys are using terms like that? There isn’t any loving connotation to the term in those instances. Jay Edwards is always using “m’dear”, “darling”, and other pet phrases like that when he’s talking to a captive in his videos.

That’s not how it is all the time. Occasionally, you’ll see a guy using it in an affectionate, but not intimate fashion. Sometimes, there’s a cultural element to it. There was a period when Brits often used the phrase “darling” to both men and women in a nonsexual friendly fashion. For a while, it was a stereotyped gay exclamation.

I have a distaste for backslapping in the workplace environment. There is a real social pecking order to whom backslappers touch and it’s always somebody at their work level or below. When a coworker slaps somebody’s back, they’re saying they are in charge. It’s rarely done to a person above their social status. These pet phrases are sometimes wielded in a similar fashion. The person, using it, is sometimes being derogatory and designating their perceived status against another.

Have you ever had one of these terms of endearment used by somebody, other than a partner, where it didn’t bother you? I’m wondering if delivery, from certain people seems okay to you depending how they do it and what your relationship is to that person. For example, I’ve often seen you and Dorothy greeting each other as “chickie” and similar phrases. Maybe it’s okay in a girl-girl fashion. Has a guy said it in a fashion that didn’t get on your nerves? It would seem, to me, to be okay in certain situations where you know the person, understand how the person talks, and understands that there is no deliberate or unconscious agenda to the phrasing.

Context is important. Using those kinds of phrases with people that aren’t known is a dicey way to go. There is no known context in those situations and the wording could be insulting, familiar, intimate, or anything else. There is no way to readily determine the person’s intent.

A writer should have the sense not allow those types of ambiguous terms into their dialog. For the post, in question, it comes across as slightly insulting, particularly by a person using “shifty” as a username. Calling a woman, in her 40s, “sweetie” almost comes across as calling you childish. It’s as if the writer is mildly putting you down and will now provide you with adult advice because “sweetie” isn’t quite grown up enough to understand what he’s talking about. The rest of the post didn’t strike me as insulting or intentionally irritating, but the “sweetie” thing just doesn’t seem right in the post. It’s hard to determine whether or not the poster was trying to be denigrating. When terms of endearment are used in writing, you always have to question why they’re used at all. They take some small amount of finite time to enter and add nothing to the discussion. Their usage at all often seems to carry an intentional context to the petname and it’s usually not in a good fashion.

Although sweetie, babe, and honey aren’t usually used between guys, sweetheart occasionally has been used in old gangster movies. Other terms, such as dog, dude, and assorted curses are often used between guys. Those terms similarly mean different things based on tone and relationships.

Since these pet terms can be taken in a negative fashion, it’s best not to use them. Until the recipient has a clear understanding about the context of how and why the term is being used, it’s very easy to take them in a negative fashion.

Posted by Richard on Thursday, June 08, 2006 at 9:45 PM

================

Whiplash Studio.com

Again another guy to jump in here on this one.

I think to a degree it has something to do with where you live. Here in Texas, “sweetie, darlin’, honey” they’re all names I commonly use with complete strangers, and yeah mostly women, but in the same right, women tend to call men the exact same names here. It’s like part of our local dialect, not meant to offend or condescend to anyone. It’s really no different from “Howdy” or “Y’all”. And yeah, it’s something we only use with the opposite sex, but so are the terms “he” and “she”. Does that seem simplistic? Yeah, but that’s because it is. What kind of fascinates me about this topic is it shows just how different people live in this country. What is completely acceptable in one part of the country is not so much in another. It’s like being able to travel the country and not find a Taco Beuno somewhere (which I’m sure some of you have no idea of what that is).

Now to e fair, when someone does voice their dislike for these names, I apologize, explain to them no harm intended and respectful cease using such names. The last thing I want to do is put someone off and I think the right thing to do is respect someone’s wishes in how I address them, I mean I often ask people not to call me “Tom”. It’s just not a form of my name I’ve ever answered to and would prefer not to. Now what I do find to be humorous at this point is on the rare occasion someone does ask me not to refer to them in such a manner, it’s someone who’s a friend of a friend or someone I see more than once that has asked me, 9 times out of 10 they later tell me it’s ok because they feel weird I talk to everyone else in one way and them in another.

This is why I say you should stand your ground L. If you don’t care for any of these names, then continue to say so. There’s nothing wrong with that and by no means is it over reacting to simply ask someone to stop doing so. I would hope most people would respectfully honor your wish and refrain from doing so. I know I would find nothing wrong with such a request and only ask that you forgive me if I slip up once or twice, its habit for me.

Posted by Whiplash Studio.com on Friday, June 09, 2006 at 9:05 AM

================

Crystal’s in Love!

i agree with cyber tease.

on a side note, though, i work in the medical field, and know that I have called both sexes “sweetie” or “honey” at one point or another. And it is more of my way of being nice to the patient, and letting them know it will be OK, in my own weird way. There is no sexism behind my Terms Of Endearment, but with men, it is absolutely gender-based. i have never seen any man call another man sweetie or honey. It does shed a different light on it when thought of it in terms of men stripping away our identities by doing it. Definitely food for thought.

Posted by Crystal’s in Love! on Saturday, June 10, 2006 at 9:25 AM

================

Wes

POWER TO YOU

well im not a woman and you have no idea who i am but if a guy refers to you with an endearment such as hunny or sweetie regardless of who he is you shouldnt be concerned about making waves just be and say what you feel if it makes you uncomfortable you shouldnt put up with it just because you need money there will always be someone else ready to take up where the last left off. but this is coming from someone who lives across the country from you and cant guarantee that anything of what i said can or cannot turn against you. The key is CONFIDENCE. NO ONE will oppose refering to someone by thier actual name if you are confident about asking them not to call you ‘hunny’ i hope that i could help for future confrontations. -DaemonKlo

Posted by Wes on Friday, July 07, 2006 at 10:53 PM

Thursday, June 08, 2006

Current mood: down

I’m going through another of those time periods where I’m a little bit depressed, can’t concentrate, don’t get a lot of work done, and spend as much time as possible hiding out.

It started out with learning that doggie Alex has bladder cancer and probably won’t be with me by Christmas, but it seems to have become a more general topic of dealing with death, since my father died last June and it’s on my mind more and more. Last Father’s Day, my whole family was at Hospice, where my father lay loopy on morphine, rigid in final stage Parkinson’s, unable to communicate with us. It was a strange Father’s Day. We spent the whole day in Dad’s room, taking turns talking to him (I don’t think he could hear us), while my little niece played cards, my sister’s boyfriend watched sports on TV, and we tried to somehow make it a family day. Anyway, because Father’s Day is coming up, I keep hearing about it on the radio, on TV, seeing ads in the newspaper, over and over again and every time I think of Father’s Day, the visual memory comes back up in my mind. I also keep returning to the frustration I had with that Hospice; the staff there gave me a lot of resistance about pain relief for my father. He was there for two weeks and they didn’t really get him comfortable until the final 2-3 days. It’s odd, but in some ways dealing with actual death is easy compared to dealing with a loved one lying around in pain minute by minute, or day after day. Well, now I’m just rambling.

So, what I’ve been doing is the usual when I’m down, which is, I struggle to get work done, and then at night I hide in chatrooms (the current one being SecondLife).

Oh, and I heard from the IRS — they say my ex-accountant never filed my 2001 business return. I know that sounds really strange but you wouldn’t believe what kind of weird, weird crap went on for a few years with my last accountant — plus the IRS typo’d my address so for who-knows-how-long the IRS mail has been going to the wrong place… Anyway, my current accountant had cleaned everything up last year (bless him) and he had phoned the IRS a few times to ask about the 2001, and the IRS kept telling him “we don’t see a problem” — well, now they do, and the IRS wants me to phone with results on Monday, but turns out my accountant is on vacation until the 15th. His fax isn’t working and he doesn’t seem to have gotten my messages yet. I guess all I can do is phone the IRS and beg them to wait until my accountant comes back and can help me with this additional cleanup.

Things I think about right now to cheer myself up… last year around 4th of July is when we found Buddy Bear in the street and he became a part of our lives, so that’s a nice anniversary coming. Also, I got a phone message from my sister and she got a 90-something on her exam and just received her state certificate for her new career path. She’s had such a hard life, she so deserves to finally have things go in a positive direction. I’m so happy for her right now.

Thursday, June 08, 2006
Current mood: tired

[this post includes comments that were added on MySpace]

I managed to finish the website updates for Bedroom Bondage and American Damsels, so now I’m coasting again.

Thought I would talk about what I do late at night in Second Life.

Second Life is one of those chat worlds where you have a character of your own, which you use to move around and interact in a 3D environment. Basically these “virtual worlds” are pretty much like if you had a live cartoon running, and you were operating one of the cartoon characters, and other people were operating the other cartoons, and you were spontaneously creating a cartoon movie as it went along.

What I’ve been doing there lately is, some friends joined up with me and we got some virtual land, and we built a bondage ponygirl ranch. My two friends are ponygirl characters most of the time so they like the ranch stuff, and we all like fooling around with the bondage equipment. We have wooden bondage wheels, suspension frames, steel cages, wood cages, etc. For some reason we don’t have an X-cross yet, which to me seems pretty odd since every bondage place in Second Life does. Guess I’ll have to fix that.

Late at night I hang out at the bondage ranch and chat with strangers who show up to the place. I ran a little ‘virtual ad’ so that people can find where we are. Most of the time I’m dressed up like a big bunny lady, but sometimes I’m human (hippie, mostly). And recently I bought a pony body so that I can occasionally take a little run around the track. Around 11pm Jon comes in to see how I’m feeling and keep me company. I’ve dressed his character up variously as a police rabbit, a gorilla, and The Crooked Claw.

I’m sure it all sounds very silly — well, indeed it is. That’s why I find this stuff such a pleasant distraction. :)

6:45 PM - 8 Comments - 4 Kudos

=============

Lorelei

When I had to take the chat pages off my websites :( I put up an ad for SecondLife in its place… so here’s info… and when you get there just send me a message, I can send you some stuff http://gagtalk.com/chat/

Posted by Lorelei on Thursday, June 08, 2006 at 7:19 PM

=============

Charlzm

I tried Second Life earlier this year (or last year, maybe) after your mentioned it on Bedroom Bondage. However, the video card in this rig leaves somethign to be desired and I couldn’t get the world to load smoothly no matter how low I set detail and frame rates.

Oh, well, it looks like hours of fun exploring other peoples’ houses and domains. I learned to love MMORPGs after I got over my suspicion of them; I played Asheron’s Call for about a year.

But I found when I met my bondage-liking girlfriend about four and half years ago, I suddenly found I just didn’t have the time (or really the interest) for pretending to be a monster-slaying warrior any more.

Posted by Charlzm on Thursday, June 08, 2006 at 7:41 PM

=============

willingly submitted

Sounds interesting, i’m going to try it out!

Posted by willingly submitted on Saturday, June 10, 2006 at 8:03 AM

=============

Stan

I made a whole bunch of neat bondage stuff, including an X-cross thingie which I can give to you next time I see you online. You need to show me around Lorelei’s Ranch o’ Bondage :)

Stan

Posted by Stan on Wednesday, June 14, 2006 at 10:03 AM

=============

Lorelei

Hey Stan, hail me — what’s your inworld name? My accounts are Lorelei Mission & Taly Fluffy.

Posted by Lorelei on Wednesday, June 14, 2006 at 10:13 AM

=============

Tess

Kinky: Constantly adjusting your SL avatar so that the bondage gear in the game fits better.

See you at the ranch.

Tess

Posted by Tess on Friday, June 30, 2006 at 11:02 PM

=============

Lorelei

OMG lol, so true. I prefer to be 5′2″ in SecondLife, but all the bondage equipment seems to be sized for amazon women. So yeah, sometimes I wind up re-setting my height to 5′10″ just so that I can fit the bondage wheel, etc. :)

Posted by Lorelei on Saturday, July 01, 2006 at 3:41 PM

Monday, June 05, 2006

As some folks know, about 5 years ago my doggie Alex got leukemia. She beat the odds amazingly and went into remission and a year ago went off treatment completely. I was very lucky to get to have her so much longer than expected. She’s meant a lot to me; Alex saved my sanity during the time that my niece was missing by keeping my mind occupied — helping to interrupt racing thoughts about the terrible things that were happening to my niece. Alex was essential to my coming out of that time period with my head intact. Cute pics of our times together at: http://www.lilaclane.com/americaneskimo/alex/

Unfortunately luck has run a little dry because now Alex just got diagnosed with bladder cancer. I’m hoping with good treatment she can hang in for another 6 months or so.

Money is tight and I want to put it toward necessities including Alex’s treatment. So we won’t be going to FetishCon this year after all. I apologize profusely because I’ve been stating on my site for months that we definitely would be there. Sorry for misinforming anybody.

This news has made me a little depressed, so to not think about it I’ve been hiding in Second Life for the past week or so. Built a bondage ranch there with some ponygirl friends. A good distraction.

Wednesday, May 24, 2006
Current mood: discouraged

Ashley Renee phoned and told me that CCBill (her billing company) appears to be flinging itself into a content clean-up project.

They contacted her about her website several times in the past week with various removal requests - made her unlink BondageDirectory, then
BondageGirls, then made her take a bunch of photosets and clips off her site.

Ashley said she asked a staffer by phone “why am I being targeted right now?” and the staffer claimed that CCBill has been told by their merchant bank to clean things up (paraphrasing here). The staffer said maybe the reason Ashley was one of the first sites contacted during this cleanup, was because Ashley’s site is near the beginning of the alphabet.

A staffer also related to Ashley that CCBill now has 15 staffers currently working on this project and that spiders were being used to check CCBill client websites to check for “forbidden” words & metatags, and links to “forbidden” sites.

In one of the written notices she got, Ashley was told to remove one set because the man grabs her from behind in a hallway before tying her up. CCBill informed her that the sneaking up from behind looked “non consensual” and therefore was a violation of their “no rape” rule. (?!)

Ashley related to me that CCBill went thumbs-down on most of her two-person sets because they said she looked unhappy in the pictures — “nonconsensual” themes.

A drawing was required pulled, categorized as “extreme violence” because it depicted a damsel in distress approaching a buzz saw. Of course, the damsel was not shown injured or contacting the saw.

Ashley has a big archive of material so she brought out some of her solo-bondage classics to fill up her photo-site again, but it’s very upsetting that a lot of her work is now on hold and can’t be seen.

For curious folks who want to see CCBill’s AUP
(Acceptable Use Policy, aka “What’s Obscene”), string together this URL (myspace futzes it ptherwise) and then scroll down to the big paragraph: .. tiny url period com slash o48cx

–Lorelei

P.S. I emailed all my CCBill members and asked them to switch to one of my other billers. I don’t think I could manage renovating my site to the degree of vanilla-ism that CCBill now expects!

8:03 AM - 9 Comments - 9 Kudos

===============

Dark Minded Promotions™

Now that is one of the stupidest things I have ever heard of. CCBill is probably doing this because of how the Government is still cracking down on adult sites and might be cracking down on the companies used for all the pay sites. Such BullS*it! As long as the person has signed a consent paper (not going into the whole legal wording here) then it should be fine.

Posted by Dark Minded Promotions™ on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 at 8:57 AM

===============

John

What a crock of you know what! Like CCBill had no idea what Ashley did when she signed up with them.. I mean come on!!! Sounds like them going with the government and stepping all over the rights of these great performers, withtheir logic of thinking than shouldn’t they also not show anything I don’t know like say King Kong since Faye Ray doesen’t seem to happy when she is kidnapped by Kong or shouldn’t PETA get it taken out of stores since it shows an animal being shot to death? I know dosen’t seem to make sense but those examples just show how stupid CCBill is being.

Posted by John on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 at 10:36 AM

===============

Doc - Artist & Writer

Censorship sucks! This is a total load of crap that we, as bondage site masters/contributors, see all too often - but when CCbill gets cold feet to this degree, we’ve got to wonder how far off the end of this ‘free speech’ party is. Granted, we’re still in a period of conservative values overseen by an increasingly ‘Big Brother’-esque government, and hopefully this will pass… but this doesn’t bode well, does it?

Posted by Doc - Artist & Writer on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 at 11:28 AM

===============

Jungle Man

UNBEFRIGGINLEIVABLE!!!! John above has some very excellent points using the Kong analogy. This whole war on pornography scare is getting waaay out of hand. What in the world happened to free speech and the ability for consenting age approved ADULTS to see what they choose to see? I find it very strange that people can write internet fiction at a free site that any child can get into, that is hundreds of times more graphic and dangerous not only describing rape but brutal torture and eventually snuff with no repurcussions, but if a simple abduction scenario is shown in a photo at a secured pay site they get threatened by the government or whatever host they use. Meanwhile, the hypocrisy continues as movies like Hostel come out and instantly become “the number 1 movie in America” it’s opening weekend. Once again, don’t get me wrong, I loved Hostel, I just wonder how long it’s going to take before the government is controlling every form of entertainment we love, and every piece of information we get once they have a stranglehold of the internet.

Posted by Jungle Man on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 at 12:05 PM

===============

Richard

Lorelei can write volumes on credit card censorship and it’s been going on for quite a few years now.

The thing that concerns me a lot is that the media has been fairly silent about the topic. Even Visa, the primary credit card censor, has been reluctant to publicly say much about their censorship efforts.

It just makes me glad that I didn’t take a major plunge to set up a full paysite. I would have lost a lot of money. I feel especially bad for people, like Ashley and Lorelei, who are trying to earn a living from their sites.

Posted by Richard on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 at 6:37 PM

===============

Duct Tape Messiah

And somewhere in Washington D.C., George Bush, Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell are clinking their brandy glasses together, giggling like 6-year olds.

I think George Carlin said it best, “It’s time to start slapping people.”

Posted by Duct Tape Messiah on Friday, May 26, 2006 at 8:46 AM

Wednesday, May 24, 2006

[this post includes the myspace comments that followed]

Just got this email…:

Hi Lorelei, I am fairly new, okay way new, to bondage. I have been trying to get my husband to get in to bondage, well just tying me up, but he is not into it. Any ideas on how I can get him to try it out?

I replied…:

Hi,

Most of the advice columns I wrote were for men, to get their gals interested.
http://bedroombondage.com/bondage/lorelei

But I know where you’re coming from because I’ve talked to women whose guys weren’t quite as into it.

In my opinion, when they’re not into it, the best we gals can do is “trade time” with them… let them know that if we did a half hour of vanilla sex last time, well, this time it’s gotta be a half hour of bondage sex. If a guy isn’t willing to meet us halfway, then there’s something wrong! LOL

The tying can be confusing for someone who isn’t into it. Make up a set of long cloth strips
http://bedroombondage.com/bondageu/drbondage/materials.html
…and ask him to tie you with those. It’s less intimidating for a guy, than trying to use rope.

Just my 2c

–Lorelei

8:31 AM - 7 Comments - 5 Kudos

===============

Lorelei

Note about silk scarves, folks. Do not use the whole scarf and then tie the knot near the ends. If you tie the thin ends into a knot, they’re hard to untie. Whenever tying with scarves make sure you leave nice long ends so that the knot will be easy to untie when needed.

Posted by Lorelei on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 at 4:50 PM

===============

Jeff Tucker!

Life is too short to spend it running from what makes you happy.

Posted by Jeff Tucker! on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 at 2:12 PM

===============

Crystal’s in Love!

instead of using rope, try using something sexy or “sensuous” so to speak. Something like a sash from your robe. And just start off with asking him to hold your hands above your head. and tell him you like it when he “overtakes” you. he might be more interested in it, if it turns into more of a power thing. initially, anyway. Make it seem like ur doing it for him. :) Hope that helps!! i am pretty new myself.. about 6 months or so. Good Luck!!

Posted by Crystal’s in Love! on Friday, June 02, 2006 at 2:32 PM

===============

Animal Instinct

As a man whose ex-wife used my enjoyment of BDSM to manipulate me, I can say that where sex is concerned, men are dogs (woof!). When she had done something to make me angry, she would go upstairs, place herself in bondage gear and call me up to have my way with her, offering to do “anything I wanted her to do…”. Somehow it was so much easier to forgive her in a smiling, sweaty state.
My suggestion for you to emulate her may not be sexually ethical, but here I believe the ends justify the means. You can tell him once you are bound you will do something he wants you to do but were reluctant to do unless helpless. If you give him a taste of your submission, how can he resist further exploration.
Start with simple items, like handcuffs and tape. Later on you can introduce each other to more complex restraints like chains and ballgags. Pantyhose and phone cords are good to use for those “spontaneous” bondage sessions when he can take you “by surprise”.
If Nike can get him to pay $300 for a pair of shoes, you should be able to get him to hogtie you without too much effort. Be well.
TxBondDom

Posted by Animal Instinct on Saturday, June 03, 2006 at 12:12 AM

See the sickest, weirdest, most bizarre VIDEOS in the world @ 2 Kids 1 Sandbox and 1 Guy 1 Cup! | Erin Andrews Sex Tape!? | Shauna Sand Sex Videos | Celebrity Oops | Anorexic Nudes